Monday, May 27, 2013

The David Icke Newsletter, May 12th, 2013 THE KILLING FIELDS ...... OF THE EVIL EMPIRE

The David Icke Newsletter, May 12th, 2013



Hello all ...

The word is 'desperate'. It has all gone pear-shaped for the Evil Empire in Syria. This is not what the script demanded. By now, President Bashar al-Assad should have gone the way of Colonel Gaddafi and an extremist Empire clone should have come brutally to power.

Instead there is currently a brutal stalemate between the US-UK-NATO-armed and trained 'rebels', many of whom came in from Libya after doing a similar job there, and the Syrian army. Rothschild Israel has sought to move things along this week with bomb attacks on Syria in the hope that the Syrian army can be weakened or to secure a Syrian response that can lead to all-out war.

Israel loves war, death and destruction and the same with those that run the United States and Britain. They are all psychopathic servants of the same Death Cult that hijacked the world a long time ago and is now seeking to complete its mission to impose a global lockdown on human freedom and choice.

The region of most focus has always been the Middle and Near East and the wider landmass known as Eurasia which connects Europe to Asia and China, and Russia to the Middle East. Continue south and you have Africa, another prime target largely because of its resources.

I mentioned last week in the newsletter about the Boston bombing the importance of this vast landmass to Empire ambitions and the connections between American and British government agencies and terrorist groups in southern Russia and the Caucasus on or close to the Caspian Sea with all its oil and gas reserves.

Long time Death Cult insider Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former National Security Advisor to President Carter, emphasised the need to subjugate Eurasia in his 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard. What he said explains so clearly the unfolding events in the Middle and Near East since the invasion of Afghanistan after 9/11:

Ever since the continents started interacting politically, some five hundred years ago, Eurasia has been the center of world power ... it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus of also challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book ...
... In that context, how America 'manages' Eurasia is critical. A power that dominates Eurasia would control two of the world's three most advanced and economically productive regions. A mere glance at the map also suggests that control over Eurasia would almost automatically entail Africa's subordination, rendering the Western Hemisphere and Oceania (Australia) geopolitically peripheral to the world's central continent ...
... About 75 per cent of the world's people live in Eurasia, and most of the world's physical wealth is there as well, both in its enterprises and underneath its soil. Eurasia accounts for about three-fourths of the world's known energy resources ...
... The momentum of Asia's economic development is already generating massive pressures for the exploration and exploitation of new sources of energy and the Central Asian region and the Caspian Sea basin are known to contain reserves of natural gas and oil that dwarf those of Kuwait, the Gulf of Mexico, or the North Sea.
General Wesley Clark, NATO's former Supreme Allied Commander Europe, said in a television interview in 2007 that in the immediate wake of 9/11 he was told by Pentagon official that 'they' were going to invade seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq and then followed by Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.

Clark said that he was bewildered by what he was told and he was either lying about his surprise or, most likely, he was well out of the loop or inner circle of the Death Cult even at his exalted level within the military. I have stressed over the years how compartmentalised the real agenda is even for those who would appear to be 'in the know'.
People are given different reasons to take or support actions that serve the overall agenda while having no idea that there is an overall agenda. Military leaders wage war against countries on the pretext of 'fighting terrorism' or 'protecting civilians from tyranny' while often having no clue whatsoever how they are being used.
If we take Clark at his word about not knowing the reason for the wish list of countries to invade after 9/11 we have a perfect example of a general who was NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe who doesn't know that there is a globally-coordinated plan for a fascist takeover that crucially requires to own and control the Middle and Near East if it is to succeed.

If you put Brzezinski's views on Eurasia together with (a) what Clark said that he was told in 2001 and (b) the attacks and invasions in the Middle and Near East since 9/11 it all makes perfect sense simply by looking at this map.
First Afghanistan was invaded on the pretext of 'getting Bin Laden'; then came Iraq because Saddam Hussein had 'weapons of mass destruction' (he didn't); this was followed by the engineered 'Arab Spring' that changed regimes in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya thanks, in the latter case, to NATO bombing and NATO-trained and armed mercenaries on the ground; the Syrian regime of President Assad was next in their sights and it was supposed to go the same way as Libya, but so far it hasn't.
This is why the Death Cult is so desperate to find an excuse to remove Assad and put an extremist Islamic government in place. Note how most of the leaders they have toppled, and in Assad's case wish to topple, have been, for all their faults, secular regimes and not extreme Islamic.
But the various 'rebels' are Islamic extremists dominated by the US-created 'Al-Qaeda' that fought Gaddafi in Libya and now confronts Assad in Syria. Egypt's 'revolution' has left the fascist Egyptian military in control along with President Mohamed Morsi, a leading member of the Muslim Brotherhood, an American-Israeli front organisation whose motto is 'Allah is our objective; the Quran is our law, the Prophet is our leader; Jihad is our way; and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.'
The Brotherhood wants to introduce Islamic Sharia law as 'the basis for controlling the affairs of state and society'. Some spokesmen have said that they now encompass 'democracy', freedom of the press, freedom of criticism and thought, freedom of peaceful demonstrations and freedom of assembly. Only the naïve would believe that this is genuine once they are in power.

'Brother' Morsi gave himself sweeping new powers once in the presidency to the extent that he was described as acting like 'a new pharaoh' and the Muslim Brotherhood is heavily involved in the war against Assad in Syria. I won't call it a 'civil war' because the instigators and leaders are largely mercenaries from outside the country.
It is ironic beyond belief that the Brotherhood states as one of its principle aims to 'unify Islamic countries and states, mainly among the Arab states, and liberating them from foreign imperialism' when it is the product of precisely such 'foreign imperialism'.
I explain in Remember Who You Are how Britain and America established the Muslim Brotherhood after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1924 and they are still controlled by them today. The Brotherhood has also served the interests of the Nazis, Israelis, Russians, French and Germans when it suited them.
Israel is now among the major sponsors of the Muslim Brotherhood. Robert Dreyfuss, author of Devil's Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam, wrote: '... beginning in 1967 through the late 1980s, Israel helped the Muslim Brotherhood establish itself in the occupied territories' and it went on to establish Hamas to be Palestinian 'opposition' that the Israelis could control and exploit.
The background to what is happening in the Middle East is a minefield of interconnected forces, many of which appear to oppose each other when in fact they are answering to the same masters.

Brzezinski said in his 1997 book that 'the pursuit of power is not a goal that commands popular passion, except in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public's sense of domestic well-being'. The 'economic self-denial (that is, defense spending) and the human sacrifice (casualties, even among professional soldiers) required in the effort are uncongenial to democratic instincts', he wrote.
In other words, people in general don't want war, death and destruction and so they have to be manipulated to accept it as a necessary evil in their own perceived interests. Or, as the cold, callous and heartless Brzezinski put it:
Moreover, as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.
His words mirrored in theme those of the Rothschild Zionist created and controlled Project for the New American Century (PNAC) which included Bush Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Vice President Dick Cheney, both vehement supporters of Israel.
It called in 2000 for American forces to 'fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars' against countries including Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran and North Korea, and called for the imposition of regime change in China (World War III). Once again, and echoing the words of Brzezinski three years earlier, the PNAC wrote ...
... [This] process of transformation ... is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor
Four years before and one year before the attacks, Brzezinski and the Project for the New American Century were talking about the same thing ... 9/11.

This was the catalyst for all that has followed both in terms of overseas wars and invasions and the domestic demolition of basic rights and freedoms. What is happening in Syria today is the continuation of the plan that was instigated on September 11th, 2001.
Given this vital role of 9/11 in all that has followed, and given the warning by Brzezinski and the Project for the New American Century that none of it was likely to happen without a perceived external threat like a 'new Pearl Harbor', is there anyone with even a modicum of brain-cell activity who can't see that 9/11 was staged by the very forces that would use it as the excuse to begin to tick-off the countries on their must-have list?
Yet the mainstream media, mainstream academia and much of the global population continues to be in child-like denial of the patently bloody obvious.
Behind all this are the Death Cult networks of families like the Rothschilds which owns Israel, the United States, Canada, Britain and the European Union, Australia etc., etc. Rothschild-controlled countries are working as one unit to advance the plan for the Middle and Near East and Eurasia in general. This includes the removal of Assad in Syria and the takeover of Lebanon, Jordan and the biggest prize of all from their point of view, Iran.
The stalemate in Syria has stalled the process with the war now going on since the spring of 2011 and an estimated 70,000 people have been killed so far. I don't call it the Death Cult for nothing. The Assad regime, far from falling quickly as the Cult anticipated, is not only still in place but currently winning back ground taken by the laughably-named Free Syrian Army (FSA).
The leading 'rebel' group fighting the Assad regime in Syria is Al Nusra, an 'Al-Qaeda' offshoot to which nearly 30 US/NATO-supported 'rebel' groups in Syria have pledged allegiance. The Death Cult created 'Al-Qaeda' and it fights its offspring where it suits and arms and funds it where it suits.

The frustration at the plan being delayed in Syria is causing Death Cult assets like British Prime Minister David Cameron and his little boy Foreign Secretary, William Hague, to press for the open supply of weapons and military support to the US-UK-NATO-controlled Free Syrian Army to replace the present and more limited covert supply through Western poodles like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey.
They say that lifting an arms embargo against insurgents in Syria will make the Syrian government negotiate a political solution. This is a barefaced lie because Assad has offered such negotiations, but they are always rejected by the US and Britain because the goal is not peaceful negotiation but bloody overthrow.
Rothschild Zionist Cameron is pressing the EU countries to either lift the official embargo immediately or remove the 'non-lethal' restriction from the list of goods currently allowed to be shipped to the Syrian 'rebel' terrorists. They have support of course from Rothschild France which despatched its military to occupy resource-rich Mali.
The Death Cult is desperate to invade Syria and speed the demise of Assad but their propaganda campaign to paint the Assad regime as the baddies and the 'rebels' as the goodies is being torn to shreds by the reports of horrific atrocities by the rebels against Syrian civilians. No doubt there have been atrocities by both sides - that is the nature of war - but the point is that it is both sides with the rebels appearing to be the most ruthless.
This is making the case harder and harder to make to officially give military support to groups with allegiance to Al-Qaeda who are slaughtering civilians every bit as much, and more, than the regime they are seeking to demonise.

Another desperate effort to trigger NATO action against Syria came when Obama announced that his 'red line' would be crossed if the Assad regime used chemical weapons and military intervention would have to be considered if that happened. The ludicrous French president Francois Hollande followed suit. He agreed that the use of chemical weapons would be 'a legitimate reason for direct intervention' and Israel naturally said something similar - any excuse for a war.
You just knew that eventually the claim would be made that Assad had used chemical weapons against civilians because these people are nothing if not predictable.
The claim based on 'evidence' supplied by, yes, Britain and France, was duly made in the hope of justifying what they are aching to do; but then came an interview with Carla del Ponte, a member of a UN panel investigating in Syria, in which she said there were 'strong, concrete suspicions' that the Syrian rebels had used sarin nerve gas.
'This was use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities', she told Swiss-Italian TV.
White House spokesman (propagandist) Jay Carney said they were 'highly sceptical of any suggestions that the opposition used chemical weapons' and they believed that Assad was responsible. Well, of course, that would be their line, but they couldn't throw the - literal - killer punch that would allow them to say that their red line had been crossed. You can be sure they will be trying again once the dust has settled on this thwarted effort.
There is gathering evidence to support Carla del Ponte's contention that the NATO-backed mercenary 'rebels' in Syria do have chemical weapons. The London Daily Mail ran a story in January 2013 about leaked emails that confirmed plans for a chemical attack in Syria sanctioned by Washington that would be blamed on President Assad to justify a 'humanitarian' invasion of the country.
The report was quickly removed from the Mail website, but you can see a captured image of the posting here. The report revealed details of allegedly hacked emails from the British and Dubai-based defence contractor Britam Defence revealing a plan 'approved by Washington' and organised through the American client state of Qatar to transport a chemical weapon (CW) to Syria that was clearly intended to be a Problem-Reaction-Solution to remove the Assad regime as they have been trying to do for so long.
The emails were revealed by a German hacker and were alleged to be correspondence between David Goulding, the Britam Defence Business Development Director, and Philip Doughty, the company's founder. This was the exchange:
We've got a new offer. It's about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
We'll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have. They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
Frankly, I don't think it's a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?
Kind regards

Why would 'the Qataris', in other words US puppet Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al Thani, the conduit for funding and arming the 'rebels' in Syria and Libya, want to pay enormous sums for a chemical weapon to be delivered to Homs in Syria, one of the centres of 'rebel' operations? There can be only one reason when it was obviously not for the Assad regime and note how the brief was to produce a weapon 'similar to those that Assad should have'.
Britam admitted that its computer system had been hacked but denied that the emails were genuine. I don't believe them. An alleged software systems administrator who said he had checked the technical details of how the Britam email was routed said: 'I have to admit that the email does indeed look genuine ... all these facts check out. So with Mythbusters objectivity I have to call this one plausible.'
Other leaked documents included what was described as 'extremely personal information' and details of some Britam employees that appeared to show they were mercenaries. A CNN report in December 2012 also revealed how the Pentagon was training Syrian rebels in the use of chemical weapons. It said:
The training [in chemical weapons], which is taking place in Jordan and Turkey, involves how to monitor and secure stockpiles and handle weapons sites and materials, according to the sources. Some of the contractors are on the ground in Syria working with the rebels to monitor some of the sites, according to one of the officials.
The nationality of the trainers was not disclosed, though the officials cautioned against assuming all are American.
Another point: why would Assad even think of using chemical weapons when he knows that it would give his global enemies just the excuse they want to destroy him? He would be crazy - and he isn't.

Syrian 'rebels' working with the US and NATO to overthrow Assad.
This week, in another frantic attempt to retrieve their timeline, we had the bombing of Syria by Israel. This was reported as a unilateral attack by the psychopaths of Tel Aviv, but it would have been sanctioned behind the scenes by the usual suspects - the US, Britain, Canada and NATO in general. Obama confirmed as much after the attacks when he said that the US 'coordinates closely' with Israel.
Israeli planes bombed locations around the Syrian capital Damascus in their second attack in three days and claimed to have destroyed stockpiles of Iranian-made guided missiles intended for the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. They produced no evidence of this and Lebanon is another target on the must-have list.

Damascus during the Israeli bombing. The people of that city have not suffered enough have they?
The political prostitutes can't find a microphone quick enough to condemn military action by their target countries, but with Israel there is always silence or the usual 'Israel has the right to defend itself'. This garbage was delivered as always by White House spokesmen, British Foreign Secretary Hague and Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird, who gave his support for the Israeli airstrikes on Syria while wearing an Israel flag on a lapel badge.
As Michael Chossudovsky from the Center for Research on Globalization said:
There was absolutely no word of condemnation uttered by the United Nations Security Council [or] Secretary General of the United Nations against Israel's attack on Syria and neither has there been a position taken by the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council.
Hey, we are talking about Israel with a population of less than eight million - it does what it likes. Syria's Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad said the attack was a declaration of war by Israel and Russian president Vladimir Putin has been quoted as warning Israel that Russia would not tolerate further attacks on Damascus and would respond.
The Death Cult plan has always been to trigger World War III with a conflict pitching the US and NATO against Russia and China - regime change in China was included in the demands of the Project for the New American Century. The same forces behind the conflict in Syria are also undermining Russia in the Caucasus.

What is happening today has been planned in detail for decades and in theme for centuries by those on the deep inside that connect with entities beyond our conscious reality. Look at how Iran has been systematically surrounded preparing for the kill and Russia knows that it is in their sights also once Iran is out of the way.
The United States government gives billions in taxpayers' money and debt to Israel every year for military and other spending, but it added more than £200 million even to that to fund a rich country like Israel to build the so-called Iron Dome air defence system designed to intercept short-range rockets and shells with plans to expand its capability to much longer distances.
The timing of the installation of the Iron Dome is no coincidence. It is preparing to defend Israel from what they know is planned to come. Those using Israel to advance a global agenda could not care less about the consequences for the general Jewish population. They are only pawns like everyone else and they live in a state of perpetual fear when they could be living in peace with Palestinians on the basis of equality of treatment and mutual respect.
No-one, not even those who believe they are on the right 'side', can avoid the consequences of living on the same planet as the Evil Empire.

The David Icke Newsletter, May 19th, 2013 WHAT'S YOUR PERSPECTIVE? ...... THE TWIG OR THE FOREST?

The David Icke Newsletter, May 19th, 2013

Hello all ...
I was contacted this week by a resident of Iran to tell me that is 'filtered' (blocked) in Iran and that I am seen as a 'persona non grata', or 'an unwelcome person'.

The term usually refers to 'a foreign person whose entering or remaining in a particular country is prohibited by that country's government' and is described as 'the most serious form of censure which one country can apply to foreign diplomats, who are otherwise protected by diplomatic immunity from arrest and other normal kinds of prosecution.'

Well, clearly the latter doesn't apply to me in the literal sense, but I take the point and I am deeply hurt. I have never been an unwelcome person before and I shall have to take to my bed.

I refer to what I call Twig People and Forest People and this is a case in point if it turns out to be true. The vast majority are currently Twig People and this is why we got into this mess. The few - though gathering in number - are Forest People.

By that I mean this: Twig People are the victims of their own myopia and cannot see beyond their race, culture, religion, job, political preference, sexuality and societorial programming. Forest People see all this as an irrelevant diversion from the big picture of global control and abuse of all races, cultures, religions, jobs, political preferences, sexualities and societorial programs.

They also see it as a diversion from the even greater truth that we are all ONE Awareness having different experiences for the Biblical threescore-years-and-ten - not that time really exists either except as a decoded program.

Ironically, I have been exposing for year after year the plan to bring death and destruction to Iran in an effort to subjugate the entire Arab world and steal its oil and gas reserves and other resources. But that is the forest, or part of it, and this is not enough when there are so many twigs to ponder and pore over.

I take it that I must be 'persona non grata' to the Iranian authorities because I challenge the right of men in frocks to dictate the lives of an entire nation. To the Twig People their twigs are the only truth and the Forest is a heresy.

'What? No twigs?'
The Forest is dangerous to all authority because by definition it means that people are connecting the dots - the twigs - and seeing what they are in totality when put together. Once that picture morphs into view all aspects of authority and the belief systems on which it stands come crashing down in an explosion of life-changing insight.
If you are a cog, but see yourself and the other cogs as individuals doing your own thing, you will never see what is really going on. But once you see the machine then your perception is immediately transformed and the real nature of your daily existence becomes blindingly obvious.

'Hey, we're just cogs in the same machine.'

'Oh shut up, have you been on the oil again?'

Cog and machine is only analogy for twig and forest - sheep and flock is another.

I see this often in the alternative media when Christian believers dismiss what I write because I don't believe in Jesus. They can't accept that someone who doesn't share their belief-system could possibly have anything valid to say because their twig trumps their forest.
I have had many Christians write to me over the years to say they are praying for me to 'see the light' which is another way of saying that they are completely right and non-Christians must therefore be completely wrong. Extreme Muslims, Hindus and Jews are the same and they are not alone. Their arrogant myopia trumps an open mind.

I had an interesting chat this week with my friend Mike Lambert at the Shen Clinic on the Isle of Wight about the known against the unknown. Society is dominated by a belief in the known. Education, science, medicine, politics and media are all founded on a belief in the known.

The known is basically the holographic realm of what is called the physical world and the unknown is the unseen infinity of waveform information and pure consciousness from which the holographic illusion is decoded and made manifest. The known is the domain of the five senses - can I see it, hear it, touch it, taste it or smell it? Oh, it must exist then.

Education is about teaching the known to the next generation of programmed 'knowers' while academics, scientists and doctors are looked upon in awe because they are perceived to know more than others about the known.

But what is this 'known'? It is what they believe is known, nothing more.

The maze knows best. The viewing deck is a heretic.
I see television news anchors saying 'what we know is ...' before repeating an official story concocted in the shadows to manipulate public perception. It may be the 'known' to the suit in the studio, but it is a pack of lies all the same.
It was known that the Earth was flat and this known was preached and imposed upon generations galore in the great centres of alleged 'education', but it was bollocks all the same. The known is only 'I believe it is known' and yet it is the very foundation of human society.

Universities across the world are acclaimed places of 'learning' but they are only teaching the known - the believed to be known - and, as Mike Lambert said, you can only truly learn by uncovering the unknown. Everything else is repeating.

When your job, status and even sense of self and security come from the known there is a built-in incentive to ignore or trash the unknown. The known fears the unknown as the twigs fear the forest because the more the unknown reveals its secrets the more the known loses its omnipotence and dominance of perception.

How funny when what is perceived as the known is only a decoded figment of the unknown's imagination. The dream is the dreamer but can see only the dream. The known is the unknown but can see only the known.

As that great philosopher and humanitarian Donald Rumsfeld said as US Defence Secretary ...

Yes, quite. Anyway, moving on ...
The 'known', the holographic illusion, is where people invent and worship their twigs while the realms of waveform and pure consciousness are the forest that connects everything as One. The Control System demands for its very survival that the twig mentality be constantly maintained and this is why so-called 'visionaries' have always been sought out and targeted by the authority of the day.

True visionaries are Forest People and thus highly dangerous to the prevailing order and its need to lasso human perception and tie it to the hologram.

Most of the alternative media can't see the forest for the twigs because on one side it takes the Bible as its arbiter of truth and possibility and on the other its Bible is mainstream 'science'. There is a growing alternative to the alternative which can see beyond both, but still those perception systems dominate at present.

I am dismissed by both of them because I challenge religion and science, which is little more than another religion anyway - with honourable exceptions. I am fine with that because they are manifestations of the known, or the perception of the known, and I want to explore way beyond that. If dismissal and ridicule is a consequence then it's well worth it.

Religion talks a good story about the 'next world', but its focus is largely in the hologram with its rules, regulations, structures and hierarchy and so most certainly is the religion of scientism. The very foundation of science is that the world is solid when it can't be.

The mainstream 'scientific' mind has been suffering from mass schizophrenia and cognitive dissonance since its worst nightmare arrived on the scene in the form of quantum physics. Life was easy before that. The world was solid, that's it; all sorted, done and dusted. But once quantum physics exploded that myth and became a mainstream 'discipline' the twigs were in danger of having to encompass the forest.
Schizophrenia and cognitive dissonance came to their aid by allowing them either to accept that quantum physics exists while, at the same time, ignoring the fact that it does; or to believe that while quantum physics proves that the world is an illusion in terms of solidity it doesn't change anything with regard to their belief in that solidity.

This was classically stated by Professor Richard Dawkins, a Master of the Twigs at Oxford University, who said that reality is not malleable while admitting that his grasp of quantum physics was 'foggy'. Close your mind to anything that challenges your twig and crack on regardless.

The perceived known can survive only so long as you refuse to include quantum physics. Once you do, the 'known' becomes a nonsense. This is not some intellectual musing, either. It is fundamental to everything that happens in human society.

'I'm a doctor - I know the known: trust me.'
This refusal of the mainstream to expand beyond its perception of the known means that hundreds of millions die and suffer from ongoing ill-health and deprivation every year when there is no need. The body systems within the hologram are but projected expressions of the body's auric energy field and its waveform information construct.
Acupuncture, for example, is treating and balancing the energetic field and harmonising the flows of energy (information) that are called meridians. If the energy field and flows are in balance then the hologram must reflect that because one is only a decoded projection of the other. This knowledge in relation to the body is another example of the forest.

But Big Pharma-controlled mainstream medicine, the offspring of mainstream 'science', does not recognise the existence of these foundation information fields of the body and sees only the hologram while not even knowing that it is a hologram.

To mainstream doctors it is a solid physical body and this condemns both their understanding and their patients to reap the consequences in the subsequent limitations of potential 'treatment' which is therefore normally confined to the scalpel and the drug.

Mainstream medicine is criticised by the more aware for only treating the symptom and not the cause, but when you seek to treat only the hologram (while believing it to be 'real') what can you do except treat a symptom in the hologram caused by a distortion in the energy field that you refuse to acknowledge even exists?

If you restore the energetic information field to balance then the hologram must follow because, again, one is a projection of the other. This is how intelligent healers treat the cause to remove the symptom - the very opposite of the mainstream approach which sees only the twigs and not the forest.
The terror of having the twigs prised from their sweaty palms is behind the gathering attacks on forest-based alternative methods of healing. Patients with their lives at risk, or parents with their child's life at risk, are told how they can and can't be treated by a 'medical' system that they are funding.

I know of situations in which doctors have said that a desperately ill patient has to be moved out of the hospital before receiving any alternative treatment that the patient has requested in a last desperate attempt to survive.

The twig mentality is so myopically-addicted that what should be the key and overriding questions are never asked: does a treatment work and could it benefit the patient? This mind-set is shockingly common within mainstream medicine and the patient's welfare becomes secondary to the belief system.

Proper healers, as opposed to doctors, and proper health care, as opposed to Big Pharma, would look at all possible treatments and use the one most likely to be effective, but that would mean opening their minds to the forest and that is the system's worst nightmare.

Instead, mainstream doctors are told what they can and can't do and it just so happens, stands back in amazement, that what they can do is the very 'treatment' peddled by Big Pharma.

You can see the twig and forest deal in politics, too. The political twig is power - or perceived power - and not what is most beneficial to the population (forest). This makes the battle for power and winning elections the focus of virtually all that happens in politics.
Far from coming together to agree what is best for the people they are supposed to represent the goal is to undermine their political opponents in every way possible so that they win or hang on to 'power'. This happens the world over as they argue over who holds the twig while the forest burns to oblivion.

Politics and governments are also founded on a belief only in the perceived known. Decisions are made about 'health' care on the basis that Big Pharma medicine is the only credible source of knowledge and the same with mainstream 'science'. The education system which underpins the whole twig mentality is coming from the same direction.

Another serious and highly destructive 'twig' is an obsession with me, me, me. You see this with politicians, but in the wider sense this twig is personal interest, resentment and jealousy and the forest is the greater good. So many times I have heard people say how much they support my work until there is something they want or don't like and then the greater good is suddenly a heap on the floor and me, me, me is the only show in town.

In short, Twig People rule the world.

Living in the box.
I spoke to a lady this week who had been targeted by Social Services after an anonymous phone call alleging that she was neglecting her children and was 'a follower of David Icke' (so she must be mentally unstable). I hope no one is a 'follower' of me because that is not the idea at all, but the point is that posting my information on a social network was being equated with being mentally ill and unfit to look after her children.
A social worker questioned her on these allegations - including what she thought of me - before accepting the fact during a home visit that the lady was certainly not neglecting her children and was not mentally unstable.

But this is what happens with Twig People. They so fail to understand the forest perspective that they have to perceive its proponents to be crazy to justify and protect their own belief system. If what a Forest Person says has any validity then twig beliefs are seriously under threat. Much better to dismiss the messenger as insane than face their own insanity.

And it is a form of insanity. One definition for the term is 'a mental illness of such a severe nature that a person cannot distinguish fantasy from reality, cannot conduct her/his affairs due to psychosis, or is subject to uncontrollable impulsive behavior.' Psychosis is defined as 'a mental state caused by psychiatric or organic illness, characterized by a loss of contact with reality and an inability to think rationally.'
Put that lot together and you have twig believers the world over. I mean, is it not a loss of contact with reality and an inability to think rationally to say that reality is not malleable while also saying that your knowledge of quantum physics is foggy?

But with Twig People dominating global society they have hijacked the sense of what is 'normal'. Oh, yes, 'normal'. This is very interesting and instructive. These are some definitions of 'normal':
Conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, pattern, level, or type; typical.
Relating to or characterized by average intelligence or development.

Free from mental illness; sane.

So 'normal' is conforming to a standard or typical pattern. But what dictates and constitutes 'standard and typical'? The behaviour of the majority. Given that the majority are Twig People it is their behaviour that becomes the standard and typical 'normal'.

The term is also 'characterised by average intelligence or development' and so to be above average intelligence makes you abnormal. And here is the punch line ... to be normal is to be 'free from mental illness; sane'.

Everything is turned on its head as usual. To be free from mental illness and sane is to conform with, adhere to, or constitute a norm, standard, pattern, level, or type; typical; and to relate or be characterised by average intelligence or development.

But how do they define average intelligence or development? It is the average compared with all the others who believe only in the perceived known.

Those that see beyond the 'known' are, by definition, too intelligent to be considered 'normal', but not normal enough to be considered 'free from mental illness; sane'. It's hysterical.
If you are born into a madhouse and you know nothing else then madness to you is normal. It is still crazy, but it's normal crazy masquerading as sanity. Welcome to Planet Earth, a standard, typical, normal, madhouse.

To grasp what is really going on here we have to disconnect the terms 'sane' and 'normal' because they are not at all interchangeable; and we have to realise that what is termed 'normal' is an advanced form of insanity.

Once people get that, everything makes sense and falls into place.

Woolwich: Problem - Reaction - Solution; A Classic Example

Monday, May 06, 2013

The worlds biggest solar PV seller was worth $13bn: now bankrupt


May there be ...

'Appalling irresponsibility': Senior scientists attack Chinese researchers for creating new strains of influenza virus in veterinary laboratory

The Corporation Manipulation Model of Food

Darkness ...

BBC man called 'The Pimp' picked up girls for Stuart Hall - and filmed them having sex

The UK’s Fake Welsh Measles Epidemic – Only 8 Cases Confirmed For March – 302 Wrongly Diagnosed and 'Notified' By Doctors

The David Icke Newsletter, May 5th, 2013 THE BOSTON BOMBING ... WHAT WE'RE NOT BEING TOLD


Hello all ...
I have been writing since the early 1990s about the two prime techniques of perception manipulation and global transformation that I call Problem-Reaction-Solution and the Totalitarian Tiptoe and both came together so blatantly with the bombings at the Boston Marathon which killed three people and reportedly injured nearly 200.
When events like this happen I like to take my time assessing the information rather than jumping in with a conclusion unless from past experience what has happened is obvious. On that score it was clear very quickly that what happened in Boston was staged, but the detail of exactly how it happened and many of the multiple reasons for why will take longer to assess. A good researcher remains open to all possibility until enough evidence accrues to point the way, but there is already enough to make some basic conclusions.
First the background that is obvious ...
The bombs are said to have been carried in backpacks and there were corporate-military operatives all over the scene before the bombs went off carrying backpacks. This creates a situation akin to those street magicians who put a ball under one of three cups and then move them around and ask you to guess which cup covers the ball.
There were so many backpacks and so which ones contained the bombs? Who knows? - and that's the idea. In fact, who knows for sure that they were even connected to backpacks? They may have been but the only reason that people think this is the case is because the police have said so.
Excuse me, but I gave up believing anything the police said without confirming evidence a very long time ago. But they showed us an exploded backpack? And? How simple is that?

It is so easy even for those who question official stories to be lulled into the acceptance of certain 'facts' when they are only 'facts' because they were announced by the authorities and repeated to death by the media until they become an 'everyone knows that'.
I shake my head often when I see media news presenters saying of a situation - 'Well, what we know is this ...' They then reel off a series of unquestioned 'facts' that are nothing more than what the authorities have said is true. Mostly, as experience has shown again and again, these 'facts' are actually lies and half-truths.
It is vital, therefore, when we are faced with events such as Boston that we clear our minds and face a blank sheet of paper with no preconceived ideas and let the evidence have its say; that is the evidence, not police and government statements. They need to be ignored, or at least put on the backburner, until credible evidence is produced in support of what they say.
Look through the accepted story of Sandy Hook and you will find little that has not come from official statements supported by no evidence whatsoever.

'What we know is ...'
Oh no, you don't. You only 'know' what you have been told to 'know'.
Two things that we we actually do know about Boston are that corporate-military personnel can be seen in photographs all around the finish line before the bombings and there was a 'practice' drill going on that mirrored what subsequently happened. The mainstream media has ignored, even ridiculed the latter, when multiple witnesses have confirmed this is true.
One 'journalist' wrote an article on the day of the Boston bombings headed: 'Why the Conspiracy Theorists Will Have a Tough Time With Boston'. A catalogue of inaccuracies and ignorance followed. As Noam Chomsky once said: 'The intellectual tradition is one of servility to power, and if I didn't betray it I'd be ashamed of myself.'
This 'journalist', David Weigel at, went on to ridicule and condemn the fact that an alternative proper journalist had questioned the official story at a Boston police press conference and in doing so Weigel revealed the true depth of ignorance and arrogance that dominates mainstream 'news'.
He said that there were too many cameras around in Boston for conspiracy theories to take root when the very opposite was the case. The cameras revealed what the authorities did not want us to see. Weigel said that this was unlike other conspiracy theories about Bohemian Grove, Pentagon damage on 9/11, the Kennedy assassination, Sandy Hook and Aurora where there 'were no video cameras rolling'.
It was too much for his mainstream mind to consider why there was no video footage at such a public and camera-swamped location as the Pentagon and why we have seen no footage from security cameras at Sandy Hook school and the Aurora movie theatre.

Weigel also said that there was no politician that would gain from the Boston attack, so revealing the stunning levels of naivety and lack of awareness in mainstream 'journalism' on which, irony of ironies, the very conspiracy that it denies depends upon to avoid exposure and sell its fake cover stories.
He then mocked suggestions that the bombing would be used for the further militarization of the streets because this is something that is 'already under way'. Yes, you silly person - and justified by previous staged events like 9/11 that you believed were real. It truly is a challenge to overestimate just what an irrelevance to human understanding that the corporate media has become.
But Weigel saved his most outrageous comments for his denial that any loudspeakers at the marathon were telling people to be calm because a drill was going on, or that bomb-sniffing dogs were in attendance. This is a quote from athletics coach Ali Stevenson on Local 15 TV who completed his run just before the first bomb went off:
'They kept making announcements on the loud speaker that it was just a drill and there was nothing to worry about. It seemed like there was some sort of threat, but they kept telling us it was just a drill.'
Stevenson also said that he had competed in the biggest marathons all over the world and had never seen security like there was at this one - long before there was any sign of trouble. Click here for the video report ...

Sniffer dogs at the Boston marathon, but don't worry, they weren't really there.
It is dawning on more and more people that the mainstream media is not only an irrelevance in terms of telling the truth about what is going on, but, through ignorance and outright censorship, misleads and misdirects people on behalf of the forces that own and control it. Audiences for mainstream 'news' have been plummeting for this very reason.
This leaves the alternative, mostly Internet media, to pick through the lies and diversions to get as close to the truth as possible and this is a responsibility that must be respected through calm and careful research that does not rush to judgement and issue definitive explanations until the evidence supports the case.
The evidence at this stage clearly points to government-military involvement in the Boston attacks long before we get to the fine detail which takes much longer to expose and often, given the multi-layers of secrecy and compartmentalisation, you never do uncover everything there is to know.
What makes the themes easier to spot, however, is that the foundation 'blueprint' of staged events like Boston is repeated time and again and this includes the 'drill' that runs side-by-side with real events. The list of these is now getting ridiculous. There were mirror-drills happening in or near the same locations as the real attacks in the case of ... 9/11, the 7/7 London bombings, the Oslo bombing, the Madrid train bombings, Aurora, Sandy Hook, Boston, and so on.
The drill is the excuse to have corporate-military personnel all over the scene or in the close vicinity and while most may genuinely think they are taking part in a practice scenario the key players will know the real story and be able to operate behind the cover of the drill.
It also offers the opportunity to recruit people who think they are playing the part of fake bombers in the drill to be caught on camera in the wrong place at the wrong time and be blamed for a real bombing instigated by the Hidden Hand. Boston had all these elements and potential possibilities.

These are some of the corporate-military personnel at the scene of the Boston bombings before they happened ...

... and here they are running away afterwards - one apparently now without a backpack. There were many of these people at the scene in the same clothing, often with backpacks, and their uniform fits that of an organisation called Craft International. This specialises in 'military, law-enforcement and civilian training, as well as private security and protection'.
Craft was established by former Navy Seal Chris Kyle who was described as a devout Christian while also claiming to be the most lethal sniper in American military history. I guess he must have missed the bit about thou shalt not kill and turning the other cheek.

Kyle was shot dead with his associate Chad Littlefield in February 2013 apparently by 'a troubled veteran whom they were trying to help', according to a Craft International statement. It added that Kyle had 'a profound effect on the lives of those he touched'. Yes, I guess with a record-breaking sniper that does tend to happen.
Craft International is one of a series of private 'security' companies mostly run by former military personnel that are contracted (a few officially, many unofficially) by the US government to carry out operations that can be done at arm's length from official channels. The most notorious of these is Blackwater which keeps changing its name to hide its history. It became Xe Services before the current cover name of Academi.
Blackwater was founded in 1997 by Erik Prince, another former Seal, with the familiar brief of providing 'training support to military and law enforcement organizations' and it has operated widely in Afghanistan and Iraq where many have died controversially at its hands.

So here you had personnel from Craft International, a 'private' military 'training and support' organisation, on and around the finish line of the Boston Marathon before the bombs went off and the authorities have simply refused to answer questions from the alternative media about what they were doing there or the fact that a drill, including sniffer dogs, was happening at the time. They did not have to refuse to answer the same questions from the mainstream media because they were never asked.

The 'men in black' at the scene were at first connected to Navy Seals because of their badge, but this is also used by Craft International, no doubt because of its Navy Seal connections through the late Chris Kyle.

Kyle and the Craft International logo.
Even what has been established this far should make anyone with a mind to call their own start to doubt the official story given that the authorities are lying about the drill and refusing to answer basic questions about what Craft International was doing at the scene.
Problem-Reaction-Solution or 'false-flag' staged attacks fall into three main categories:1) When elements within the government-military complex plant the bomb and blame innocent patsies; 2) When they covertly agent-provocateur others to plant the bombs (a speciality of the FBI); 3) When the government-military complex is aware of a genuine plot and allows it to happen when it could have been stopped.
With all the military and military-connected personnel caught on camera in the most significant locations, and wearing backpacks before the Boston 'backpack bombs' went off, pick any one from these three.
It is fundamentally significant that one of the brothers blamed for the Boston attacks, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, had connections to US law enforcement and security agencies like the FBI and CIA and he would certainly have been in a position to be set up in a 'drill' or agent provocateur 'sting'.

19-year-old Dzhokhar Tsarnaev among the marathon crowd with his 26-year-old brother Tamerlan.
Their mother, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, said that her eldest son, Tamerlan, who was killed by the police, was under the control of the FBI - an organisation notorious for covertly setting up targets through its agents and informants to plan terrorist attacks and then either claiming to have foiled them just in time or allowing them to go ahead when they could have been stopped.
This has prompted bizarre, though accurate, headlines such as: 'The FBI again thwarts its own terror plot'. Examples of this FBI modus operandi include the World Trade Center bombing of 1993; the Oklahoma bombing of 1995; the 'thwarted' attack on Fort Dix personnel in 2007; the 'thwarted' bomb attack in Portland, Oregon, in 2010; and the 'thwarted' attack on a bridge in Ohio in 2012.
Robert Mueller, the head of the FBI at the time of 9/11, continues to run the agency on behalf of those that control him and he has overseen outrageous plots instigated to set up their patsy targets. Even The New York Times reported:
'The United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years - or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts.
But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. Suspects naïvely played their parts until they were arrested.'

Writer and researcher Trevor Aaronson studied the history of FBI-created 'terror plots' for his book, The Terror Factory. He said of these FBI patsy 'terrorists':
'They're actually almost entirely bumbling morons who couldn't tie their own shoes or buy the laces without FBI instigation and support. The FBI plants the ideas, makes the plans, provides the fake weapons and money, creates the attempted act of terrorism, makes an arrest, and announces the salvation of the nation.
Over and over again. The procedure has become so regular that intended marks have spotted the sting being worked on them simply by Googling the name or phone number of the bozo pretending to recruit them into the terrorist brotherhood, and discovering that he's a serial informant ...
... Most of the rest charged with "terrorism" had little or nothing to do with terrorism at all, most of them charged with more minor offenses like immigration offenses or making false statements. Three or four people out of the whole list appear to be men whom one would reasonably call terrorists in the commonly accepted sense of the word.'

Mother Jones magazine and the Investigative Reporting Program at the University of California-Berkeley investigated the cases of 508 defendants in terrorism-related cases and found the following:
* Nearly half the prosecutions involved the use of informants, many of them 'incentivized' by money (operatives can be paid as much as $100,000 per assignment) or the need to work off criminal or immigration violations.
* Sting operations resulted in prosecutions against 158 defendants. Of that total, 49 defendants participated in plots led by an agent provocateur - an FBI operative instigating terrorist action.
* With three exceptions, all of the high-profile domestic terror plots of the last decade were actually FBI stings.
* In many sting cases, key encounters between the informant and the target were not recorded - making it hard for defendants claiming entrapment to prove their case.
It is against this background that we should consider the connections between the two alleged Boston bombers and the FBI.

Their mother said of elder son, Tamerlan:
'My son, he was set up. He was counselled by the FBI for 3 to 5 year. They knew what my son was doing and what actions and what sites on the internet he was going. They used to come home; they used to come and talk to me; they used to tell me that they are counselling ...'

His father, Anzor Tsarnaev, said the FBI had watched his son closely and visited him at home:

'Yes, I was there. It was in Cambridge
[Massachusetts]. They said: "We know what sites you are on, we know where you are calling, we know everything about you. Everything." They said we are checking and watching - that's what they said.'

The Russian newspaper Izvestia claims to be in possession of documents leaked from the Republic of Georgia Interior Ministry which reveal that Tamerlan Tsarnaev attended seminars in Georgia between January and July of 2012 arranged by the Washington-based Jamestown Foundation which was established in 1984 by CIA Director William Casey and remains extremely close to the CIA.

The seminars also involved an organisation known to be associated with the Jamestown Foundation called the Caucasus Fund which was founded after the Georgia-Russia conflict in 2008 with the aim of recruiting intelligence operatives to work in southern Russia.
The Tsarnaev family is of Chechen origin and separatists in Chechnya in the North Caucasus have fought an overt and covert war for independence from Russia although this has diminished in the last few years.

The Jamestown Foundation brings us to major global conspiracy asset, Zbigniew Brzezinski, the former National Security Advisor to President Carter, co-founder with David Rockefeller of the cabal's Trilateral Commission, and, by his own statements, the man who drew the Soviet Union into its disastrous invasion of Afghanistan by arming and training Afghan terrorists to target the Soviet satellite regime then in power in the capital Kabul.
These Brzezinski terrorists became known as the Mujahedeen/Taliban and the US arranged for Osama bin Laden to be despatched to Afghanistan from Saudi Arabia to be the frontman for the resistance to the Soviet invasion before blaming him for 9/11 and using that to justify their own Afghan invasion.
The Jamestown Foundation was established to support Soviet dissidents and you would expect Brzezinski to be involved given his obsessive hatred of Russia. Brzezinski has served on the Jamestown board of directors and anything that he is involved with is serving the interests of the global cabal.

The US industrial-military-intelligence complex has been covertly targeting Russia in the Caucasus as part of its plan to control the entire region known as Eurasia which connects Europe to China and Russia to the Middle East. This includes support for groups seeking the separation of Chechnya from Russia and the propaganda against Iran is also part of this Eurasia agenda. Brzezinski has said that, in effect, he who controls Eurasia controls the world.
Another significant US organisation in the region is the American Committee for Peace in the Caucasus (ACPC), sponsored by the right-wing organization Freedom House, whose board members have included Brzezinski, 9/11 Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and his more powerful 'deputy', Paul Wolfowitz, among many other players in the global conspiracy.
Freedom House is currently chaired by William Howard Taft IV, great-grandson of President William Howard Taft, and he served in both the Reagan and Boy Bush administrations as well as being a permanent representative at NATO. The director of the Jamestown Foundation seminars in the Caucasus last year, allegedly attended by Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was reportedly a former employee of Freedom House.

George Soros, the financial manipulator, Brzezinski associate and Rothschild gofer, has long been heavily involved in the Caucasus region with his front operations like the Open Society Institute and Central Eurasia Project which has sponsored events with the Jamestown Foundation. US investigative journalist Wayne Madsen wrote:
'Upon becoming President in 2009, Barack Obama adopted [Senator John] McCain's proposal and authorized CIA support for North Caucasus secessionists and terrorists with money laundered through the USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy, Soros's Open Society Institute, Freedom House, and the Jamestown Foundation.
In January 2012, Obama appointed a Soros activist and neocon, Michael McFaul of the right-wing Hoover Institution at Stanford University, as U.S. ambassador to Moscow. McFaul immediately threw open the doors of the U.S. embassy to a variety of Russian dissidents, including secessionists from the North Caucasus, some of whom were suspected by the Russian FSB of ties to Islamist terrorists.'
The FBI accepts that it was warned by Russia about the ethnic Chechen Tamerlan Tsarnaev in 2011. Agents interviewed him and members of his family, but an FBI statement said it found no evidence against him of terrorist activity of any kind.

Tsarnaev travelled to Chechnya's Russian neighbour Dagestan on the Caspian Sea in 2012 where members of his family now live and he was allowed to move around freely before leaving which doesn't fit with the Russian concern about his potential terrorist activities against them.
In fact, very little fits because there is a whole other story that we are not being told. US Secretary of State John Kerry stated that Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been 'radicalised' during a six-month visit to Dagestan and Chechnya in 2012 - the time of the Jamestown seminars.
It is becoming ever clearer that the Tsarnaev family, both in Dagestan and America, has many connections to US intelligence and law enforcement agencies and this is why the mother can be so adamant that her sons were set up. Her words and manner reveal knowledge of how the game works.
Despite this long backstory that the FBI has with the Tsarnaevs, a few days after the bombings an arrogant and uncomfortable-looking Richard Deslauriers, the FBI special agent in charge of the Boston Division, produced pictures of the brothers at a news conference and asked for the public's help in identifying them. He said:
'Somebody out there knows these individuals as friends, neighbours, co-workers, or family members of the suspects. Though it may be difficult, the nation is counting on those with information to come forward.'
How crazy can you get when they had to know exactly who they were? But this was nothing to do with identifying suspects. It was to introduce them to the public consciousness in preparation for the cover story that was about to be told. With this in mind, Deslauriers said at this same news conference:
'For clarity, these images should be the only ones - the only ones - that the public should view to assist us. Other photos should not be deemed credible and unnecessarily divert the public's attention in the wrong direction and create undue work for vital law enforcement resources.'
Here is our story and nothing is going to be allowed to question or contradict it. By dawn of the next morning Tamerlan Tsarnaev had been killed by police and his brother was on the run.

Then there is the alleged bombers' uncle, Ruslan Tsarni (formerly Tsarnaev), who faced the media immediately after his nephews were named but not yet found and condemned them at the top of his voice.

I thought as I watched him that he was jumping the gun accepting their guilt from no more than a police report and the vehemence of his delivery led me to conclude that he either knew far more than he was saying and/or he wanted to distance himself as comprehensively as possible and protect his own standing and reputation.

What Ruslan Tsarni said, and the way that he said it, was key to confirming in the public mind at this stage that the two men the FBI had highlighted were indeed the Boston bombers. So who is Ruslan Tsarni?

Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen mentioned the connections between USAID, the United States Agency for International Development which has been widely connected to the CIA, and the American organisations manipulating events in the North Caucasus. Bolivian President Evo Morales announced only this week that he is expelling USAID from his country for seeking to 'conspire against' the Bolivian people and government.
Uncle Ruslan, it turns out, was contracted as a 'consultant' to USAID in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan in the early 1990's. The Tsarnaev family lived close to the Kazakhstan border at Tokmok in Kyrgyzstan before moving to the United States. According to Timur Toktonaliev, a Radio Free Europe and Kyrgyz Service correspondent, the Tsarnaevs were well known in Tokmok and lived next door to organized crime boss Aziz Batukaev, himself an ethnic Chechen.
Ruslan Tsarni is described as a lawyer and oil executive and it is worth reading this article at MadCow Morning News headed 'Was Boston Bombers "Uncle Ruslan" with the CIA?' for some very interesting background to this man's activities. Click here ...

You can see the significance of Kazakhstan to the 'control Eurasia' agenda which includes the subjugation of the Caspian Sea countries with their massive reserves of oil and gas. This is another prime reason why they are desperate to attack Iran and look at the other associated countries that have already been invaded or are under attack ... Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Anyway, back to Uncle Ruslan Tsarni. He also established a company in 1995 called The Congress of Chechen International Organizations which sent aid to Islamic terrorists in Chechnya and listed its address as the home of Graham Fuller, the Vice-Chairman of the CIA's National Intelligence Council during the Reagan presidency. Fuller had earlier been CIA National Intelligence Officer for the Near East and South Asia - the very region we are talking about.
Fuller has confirmed this information about Ruslan Tsarni (Tsarnaev) and his company, published again by the MadCow Morning News website. Uncle Ruslan was married to Fuller's daughter and this is the same CIA Graham Fuller who is quoted by intelligence whistleblower Sibel Edmonds as saying:
'The policy of guiding the evolution of Islam and of helping them against our adversaries worked marvellously well in Afghanistan against the Red Army. The same doctrines can still be used to destabilize what remains of Russian power, and especially to counter the Chinese influence in Central Asia.'
The CIA's Graham Fuller and his daughter Samantha Ankara Fuller who was married to Uncle Ruslan.
Sibel Edmonds, an Iranian-American former FBI translator and founder of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, also said that Tamerlan Tsarnaev fitted precisely the profile of people the CIA seeks to recruit for operations in the Caucasus and so did the way his mother described the approach by the FBI and his long-term 'counselling' by its agents.
This is the background information that reveals the forces and networks operating behind the cover of the official and ludicrous narrative of the Boston bombings. The US/Britain/NATO alliance is working to destabilise the Russia-controlled countries of the Caucasus using agents, informants and the very Islamic fanatics that it condemns elsewhere when it suits them.
Edmonds translated communications between Islamic radicals in the wake of 9/11 and she says that Bin Laden and his associate, Ayman al-Zawahiri, continued to work with the US government for three months after the attacks to destabilise the Caucasus region in Southern Russia. This was at the same time that the Bush administration was saying that they must invade Afghanistan to 'get Bin Laden'.

Edmonds connects Bin Laden to Operation Gladio which began after the Second World War and specialises in carrying out attacks that are blamed on target groups the instigators wish to demonise and are used to justify increased government powers.
Operation Gladio was the work of British and American intelligence but has involved operatives from many countries, most notably Italy where one of its attacks was the Bologna station bombing in 1980 which killed 85 people and was blamed on a terrorist group called the Red Brigades to demonise communists.
An Italian parliamentary investigation in 2000 heard that the bombing was actually carried out by 'men inside Italian state institutions and ... men linked to the structures of United States intelligence.' Yes, see Henry Kissinger. Former Gladio agent Vincenzo Vinciguerra said in sworn testimony:
You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security.
This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the state cannot convict itself or declare itself responsible for what happened.
In other words ... Problem-Reaction-Solution.

Sibel Edmonds said that Bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri worked for NATO and the Pentagon as part of Operation Gladio which continues to this day. She said:
For the past 11 years I have been emphasizing that my State Secrets Privilege and Gag Orders had to do with the FBI files (covering period 1996-2002 February) on covert-terrorist operations in Caucasus and Central Asia backed, managed and armed by US actors. These US-NATO directed operations in the region involved Bin-Laden and mainly Zawahiri ...
... The FBI documents contained damning evidence (audio and written) collected between 1996-2002 tying these terror operations directly to the U.S. persons in the State Department/CIA and Pentagon. Also, how the State Department got Congress to grant huge amounts of funds to 'front' NGOs and businesses (mainly Turkish companies in US-listed/members of ATC) to funnel money to the terrorist cells in this region.
The US and British governments say they must fight Islamic extremism in Afghanistan and elsewhere while arming, funding and training the very same people in Syria, the Caucasus, Libya and other parts of Africa. Those involved are too stupid and mindless to see how they are being manipulated to a common end which includes their own destruction.
The aim is to have these idiots look to US-controlled Saudi Arabia and Qatar for their leadership and guidance - the very two Islamic states at the forefront of supporting the US-controlled Islamic mercenaries in Libya and Syria with money and arms.
Somehow caught up in all this on April 15th, and we may never know exactly how, were Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev at the Boston Marathon. If they were genuine bombers the FBI knew enough about them to have stopped them and if they were patsies the FBI knew enough about them to have set them up.

Despite all the people with backpacks on view near the finish line - including all of those from Craft International - the authorities told people that the other images were not relevant. They were only interested in those of the Tsarnaevs because they were the names on the song sheet.
Their parents said that the FBI had been watching Tamerlan Tsarnaev for up to five years and that he knew they were tracking him. So how could the bombing have been allowed to happen then if the official story is true? His parents said that the FBI had called Tamerlan after the bombings to accuse him of being involved. He had replied 'That's your problem', his father said.

The brothers do not appear to have lived strict Islamic lifestyles to say the least or to have been obsessed with religion and we should remember that virtually everything 'we know' about them and what happened between the bombings and their death and capture is only what the authorities have told us.
They said that Tamerlan died in a shoot-out with police and when his brother ran over him in a car trying to get away, but that is not what a witness close to the scene said happened. The witness, referred to as Linda, was interviewed on WEEI 93.7 FM in Boston on April 19th.
She said that she was at her boyfriend's house in Dexter Street where Tamerlan is said to have died. Linda said she heard gunfire getting louder and closer to the house:
'I just started screaming because I knew something was wrong. We rushed to the front of the house ... where we saw the first suspect get hit by a police SUV and after he was hit [he was] shot multiple times.'

She said that minutes later an ambulance arrived to take the man away and 'within moments we were surrounded by SWAT, Boston Police, Watertown Police, Cambridge Police ... It's been tough watching the neighbours being pulled out of their houses at gun point and the SWAT ... it's been a really long night ...'

Linda was asked to confirm that the police vehicle hit Tamerlan Tsarnaev first and she replied 'correct'. She added: 'I did not see him fire, I just remember seeing him get shot multiple times.'

Tamerlan Tsarnaev was dead and could not speak for himself and we were left with the police to tell us what had happened as the search was launched for younger brother Dzhokar. The only narrative about this came once again from the police and the idea is to get your story out first and make that the only one that most people ever hear. This is what happened with 9/11 and happens every time.

We were told that Dzhokhar had been captured in another shoot-out after being found hiding in a boat but it emerged that it could not have been a 'shoot-out' because officials later said that he didn't have a gun and a police officer injured in the capture was the victim of 'friendly-fire'.

The police said that Dzhokhar would possibly be unable to talk after 'shooting himself in the throat'. If, as they said, he was trying to commit suicide why would he shoot himself in the throat? If he wasn't, why would he shoot himself in the throat? If he didn't have a gun, how did he shoot himself at all?

One minute he was in hospital with a throat wound that would likely mean he couldn't speak and the next the police are telling us how he was confirming their official story. It was laughable.

Once a suspect is taken into custody this is usually the end of any alternative version of events anyway because of the sophistication of modern-day mind control which can convince even the most innocent that they are guilty.

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev emerges from the boat.

There are so many questions that still have not been answered and they won't be by the authorities because once their story is unleashed nothing is allowed to question or contradict it; but it is obvious from the information that I have laid out here that a very different version of events is being hidden.

There was another great bonus for the global conspiracy in that the search for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev allowed them to get Americans used to the kind of martial law that is planned for the whole country and to test public reaction to it.

The crowds that chanted 'USA, USA' in response to a police operation that had turned Boston into a city under military control was not encouraging to say the least and so many continue to live in child-like self-delusion in the face of what is happening.
But there is much to make us optimistic, too. These staged events are becoming so much more difficult to sell compared with before as people in ever-increasing numbers get the message about Problem-Reaction-Solution, how it works and to what end.
Boston was their hardest sell yet because of this emerging awareness and it can only get even harder from hereon as news of the global agenda expands further into public consciousness.